Flies crawl across a sleeping baby's face; a massive unemployment line unfolds beside a building inscribed with the graffito "Wahlt Hitler" (Vote for Hitler; the year is circa 1933 the place.

Flies crawl across a sleeping baby's face; a massive unemployment line unfolds beside a building inscribed with the graffito "Wahlt Hitler" (Vote for Hitler; the year is circa 1933 the place, Hannover); a child writes "Streik" (Strike) at the bottom of her exercise book; a sign at the interest of a wood proclaims, "Juden sind in unsern deutschen Waldern nicht erwunscht" (Jew are not wanted in our German forests); travelling chapmans hawk lemons, shoes, chestnuts, anything they can. Images as it was as these were being published by way of workers in their own periodicals extended before Walter Benjamin--in his famous 1934 essay, "The Author as Producer"--underlined the revolutionary potential afforded by way of the mass media to minimize the boundary between the husbandmans and the consumers of information. on the late '20s the Communist Party's efforts to bring workers into the cot [i]or[/i] cote through photography had given rise to a thriving photo-journalist pres step quickly by and for workers. disposes like Vereinigung der Arbeiter-fotografen Deutschlands (Association of German worker photographers), which gave members access to darkrooms and to communally purchased equipment, were publishing their photographs in magazines like Der Arbeiter-Fotograf (The worker-photographer, 1926-33) and the Arbeiter Illustrierte-Zeitung (Workers illustrated just discovereds 1924-33, known as AIZ). Although many of these photographs were wasted or destroyed during the war, "Camera as Weapon: Worker Photography Between the Wars," a traveling exhibition curated by way of Leah Ollman, tries to at hand a survey of the worker-photography move not only in Germany, where it began, unless throughout Europe.

Just what sort of weapon was the camera? Whereas "art" photography was idea to serve only the interests of the bourgeoisie, either as entertainment or as a means of solidifying their power, worker-photography was to oblige a radical function in the pair the class war and the contest against fascism. "We must proclaim proletarian reality in all its disgusting ugliness, with its indictment of society and its demand for revenge" declared Edwin Hoernle a comrade of the worker photographers. "We will have no veils, no retouching, no aestheticism; we must at hand things as they are, in a hard, merciless light." Eugen Heilig's Unemploy Man Living forward Refuse, 1932, was precisely the sort of consciousness-raising photograph called for: as the devoid of warmth [i]or[/i] heat invades a poor man's shed he stares into the camera with woeful watchs holding up his meager meal of garbage (some fruit rinds, and a slab of something that could be either bread or meat).

In spite of the many sharp images created by way of worker-photographers, the esthetic championed from the ideologues behind the motion was sometimes limited by the party line. Although publications like AIZ made advantageous use of the mordant montages of John Heartfield, generally they scowled upon such "arty" techniques, believing that they detracted from the power of the image to rise in hostility before the reality of a social situation. At other times, the work falled into the maudlin: Wilhelm Willi's Untitled (Elite Hotel) Zurich, ca. 1930 which contrasts a destitute woman with the sign for a place called the Elite public-house is the sort of picture beginning-photography bookish mans take.

This show seems to reiterate another argument state forth by Benjamin: the value of a political work does not hang solely on the "correctness" of its politics, if it be not that on the efficacy of its esthetics as well. It is a valuable point, given the political orientation of greatly contemporary art: the phrase "camera as weapon" does not mean you cast a Leica at a Nazi, on the other hand that you make a threatening image.

...

Home